Many of our members have been asking us for a way to get hands-on practice with Microsoft Dynamics 365. Great news! A 30-day Dynamics 365 trial has recently been made available by Microsoft, and this article...(read more)![]()
↧
How to get access to a 30-day Dynamics 365 trial
↧
DAXDUTIL is deprecated
Hi all,
Some breaking news: DAXDUTIL repository on github has been deprecated. All its content will be available undefinitly, since there are good AX 2012 on it. Regarding the D365O (AX7) tools, at the moment 2 new repositories has been created:
- D365O-Addins: Contains Visual Studio add-ins used for Dynamics 365 for Operation developments. For all beloning projects, please refer to Wiki page.
- D365O-Snippets: Contains snippets used on Visual Studio X++ code editor. For all beloning snippets, please refer to Wiki page.
I found this way much easier to maintain and track the upgrades.
Any questions, please leave a comment.
Tchau!
↧
↧
February release – Dynamics AX 2012 R3
Microsoft Dynamics AX In-Market team has recently added a new method to release code defects, design change requests, feature requests and proactive fixes for Dynamics AX 2012 R3. The new approach is to release these types of fixes in a predictable monthly cadence.
The February release for Dynamics AX 2012 R3 version is now available in LCS on the updates tile inside your R3 project. This update represents a typical collection of smaller functional improvements and technical fixes. Bugs were fixed in all areas with enhancements found in Electronic Reporting, Warehouse Management, Human Resources, Procurement and Retail. Please see the full list of hotfixes below to search for your specific issue newly included in this release. This release is a cumulative package including all other fixes released in the prior CU12 update.
Here are a few details related to this release:
· Primary Build: 6.3.5000.2702
· Number of Application hotfixes: 174
· Number of Binary hotfixes: 17
Details of the install process can be found here: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh538446.aspx#PackageR3
What is included in this month’s release?
Design Change Requests, Feature Requests & RegFs
| KB Details | Description of issue or change request | Description of enhancement |
| KB3217093 | Line comment details (Size, Color, Style, Comment and Discount) are not displayed by default for items in MPOS. | Changes have been made such that transaction screen will show line comments along with discount by default. |
| KB3205828 | Unable to start processing work header that were awaiting demand replenishment since the header and not the affected lines were blocked. | New enhancement has been done that allows us to start a work that has some lines awaiting demand replenishment and process the lines that can be picked |
| KB3217157 | When a work is completed, a counter is decremented on WHSWaveTable. This update happened using exclusive locks which could negatively impact performance. Further there was a risk the counter fields would go out of sync with the actual work completed. | These counter fields were redundant and has been removed. |
| KB3210822 | The central warehouse flows are subjected to an issue, and it causes partial transactions to be committed to the database. This issue occurs typically when the system is under the heavy load. It manifests itself in a number of ways, including work being created but the associated waves and loads not reflecting it. | The changes in the hotfix ensure the impacted processes will use a reliable pattern. |
| KB3212427 | When trying to invoice a sales order for which there is a confirmed intracompany purchase order, it is taking 10+ hours to process | Changes are made such that it takes utmost 1 hour for processing the order |
| KB3210293 | While running warehouse management feature observed some data corruption issues | Fixed the data corruption issues. |
| KB3207958 | User wants to put items directly from RAF directly to a Transfer Order in one step. | Changes have been made such that user can put items directly from Production to transfer order. |
| KB3215971 | System is not supporting the Location Directive “Restrict to Unit” feature. Instead of splitting quantities between two layers, it is using the lowest quantity. | Changes have been made accordingly to split work based on directive unit |
| KB3215008 | User is using info-codes to capture information while taking a product for Service/Repair. System must prompt for additional details through info-code trigger. In current state, unable to capture all the details in sequence | Changes are made such that CRT retrieves one info-code at a time and prioritize triggered info-codes in the order of info-codes. |
| KB3218716 | A payroll tax engine update has been released. | Updated binaries to reflect recent Symmetry tax engine updates
|
| KB3210581 | New version of two reports (Electronic ICP declaration, Electronic OB declaration) appeared. | Changes in macros and XSLT resource file were made. |
| KB3208195 | Generation of Block K in SPED FISCAL for layout version 010 | New RegF developed |
| KB3214515 | MX – Ledger Accounting statement – End year close and adjustment transactions must be included in the period 13 | New RegF developed |
| KB3217027 | RU – Changes in the SZV-M report to Pension Fund – AX 2012 R3 | New RegF developed |
| KB3180277 | When there are multiple sales prices defined for different sales unit, ‘Create label by products’ only auto generate one shelf label for the basic sales unit. | Enable multiple sales units per item |
| KB3218445 | JP – The appended table 16 series needs to be able to be generated by fixed asset groups | Series will be able to be generated by fixed asset groups. |
| KB4010539 | Return of products without a receipt not possible when the Item has blocked for sale at the POS | Will allow return even if item marked as blocked. |
| KB3207921 | Poland/POL: Changes for SAF VAT report are available in 2017 in Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012 R3 | The changes in the hotfix make sure the changes for the Polish SAF VAT report are available in Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012 R3 from year 2017. |
| KB4010926 | RU – CDCR – Possibility to split FA depreciation into smaller journals DAXSE 3666049 – AX 6.3 | DCR has been developed |
| KB4011994 | With the public sector key, posting definitions, and balancing dimensions by fund enabled, when retainage is generated for an invoice, often unbalanced entries are generated and the invoice cannot be posted. | Update code to generate accounting distribution and resulting SLJL for the retainage entry using posting definitions resulting in balanced entries. |
| KB3218786 | Multithreading import of data to staging using DMFGenerateSSISPackage::generateStagingData causes issue | Solved generic multi-threading issues in the codebase. |
Fixes Released
| KB Number | Complete Feature Path | Title |
| 4011345 | DAXSE\AIF\Web Services | AifRuntimeCacheManager doesn’t catch UpdateConflict errors causing problems with BizTalk |
| 3216573 | DAXSE\AX Retail | MPOS Email sales receipt not printing Image. |
| 3216672 | DAXSE\AX Retail | Add product has error when remove item |
| 3217397 | DAXSE\AX Retail | Not valid RetailEventNotificationAction records generated. |
| 4010638 | DAXSE\AX Retail | MPOS Activation fails after Creating offline Customer order or offline Customer quotation |
| 3215768 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Call Center | After changing Net amount in Sales order line from Call center but Manual discount percent not removed |
| 3216016 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Call Center | Check Out in Order hold form with no call center order lines causes stack trace error |
| 3217138 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Call Center | Price override check box is still marked after price override is removed. |
| 3218704 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Call Center | Price details not updated correctly for Sales order created in Call center (continue DAXSE#3802505) |
| 3218726 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Call Center | Incorrect behavior when updating Total discount group and Line discount group in Sales quotation header registered from Call center |
| 3218741 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Call Center | Retail discounts not updated correctly for Sales quotation created in Call center by Copy function |
| 4010402 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Call Center | Not correctly updated prices and discounts when Copying Sales order in Call center – Copy precisely |
| 4010938 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Call Center | Retail discounts not updated correctly for Sales quotation created in Call center |
| 4010469 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Call Center\Customer service and inquiry | Cross-selling only working for items with on-hand stock. |
| 4010538 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Call Center\Order Status | The customer account field (SalesTable.CustAccount) cannot be modified on the sales order |
| 3218422 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Customers and loyalty\Customers and Groups | Problem with CUSTOMER GROUP on MPOS – Tax group not updated when changed |
| 3217400 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Store operations and POS\Daily Operations | Loyalty card balance is wrong on MPOS. |
| 3218386 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Store operations and POS\Daily Operations | Can’t declare starting amount for blind closed shift after applying KB 3166870 |
| 4010833 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Store operations and POS\Infocodes | MPOS fails to prompt for infocode input on triggered info codes beyond the second prompt. |
| 4010873 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Store operations and POS\Infocodes | Age Limit Infocode causes info code characters to exceed 100 characters when assigned to an item and the transaction is not created in EPOS or MPOS |
| 3216979 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Store operations and POS\Other Payments (Check, On-account etc) | MPOS payment amounts are entered incorrectly after KB 3207735 |
| 4011874 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Store operations and POS\Other Payments (Check, On-account etc) | MPOS: When a partial payment is made with another payment method, cash rounding for the remaining amount does not complete the transaction |
| 3218424 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Store operations and POS\Sales, Returns and Other Transactions | PriceHasBeenKeyedIn flag resets on Suspended and Recalled POS transaction |
| 4011460 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Store operations and POS\Sales, Returns and Other Transactions | MPOS: Returnable products list does not show variant information necessary to select the correct item for return. |
| 4011014 | DAXSE\AX Retail\Solution\Store operations and POS\Workers and login | Cashiers are unable to close a shared shift. |
| 3194793 | DAXSE\AXL\APAC localizations\China | CN-Cannot run the Chinese Voucher continuity check |
| 3209095 | DAXSE\AXL\APAC localizations\China | CN-Fixed Asset Status report not filtering based on Fixed Asset number selected |
| 3202237 | DAXSE\AXL\APAC localizations\India | IN-TDS is incorrectly calculated in vendor invoice journal with multiple voucher/lines (Refresh issue) |
| 3206745 | DAXSE\AXL\APAC localizations\India | IN – TDS is not posted on first voucher when TDS amount is adjusted with more once in multiline general journal scenario |
| 3217624 | DAXSE\AXL\APAC localizations\Japan | JP LOC – Previous selection of Value models area in Form 26 – Depreciable assets form is not saved |
| 3178298 | DAXSE\AXL\APAC localizations\Singapore Malaysia and Thailand | MY-Customer/Vendor details are not getting updated in GAF file for Misc. Charges |
| 3208907 | DAXSE\AXL\APAC localizations\Singapore Malaysia and Thailand | TH-Depreciation periods are incorrectly calculated in Leap year when period type is set to Daily |
| 3211100 | DAXSE\AXL\APAC localizations\Singapore Malaysia and Thailand | TH – WTH tax not working for inter-company vendor payment |
| 3211100 | DAXSE\AXL\APAC localizations\Singapore Malaysia and Thailand | TH – WTH tax not working for inter-company vendor payment |
| 3211069 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations | SEPA Direct Debit :Payment Advice Report print on screen only |
| 3214444 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations | SEPA file is not created from remittance journal |
| 3216413 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations | [Italy] AX2012R2 PA E-Invoice with useless information in Address tag |
| 4010627 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations | Porting request from 3800048: DTAZV format: Extra space characters after KB3060514/DAXSE 3618726 |
| 4011518 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations | [Italy] AX2012 R3 Fixed asset book with a wrong Net Book Value in case of revaluation transactions and disposal |
| 4011432 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Belgium | KB3199262 – Belgian Invoice turnover report does not accept creditnotes |
| 4010629 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Eastern Europe | Open transactions report cannot be processed without System administrator privileges in Polish localization |
| 4011505 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Eastern Europe\Hungary | Hungarian Sales Tax transactions report does not return exempted VAT correctly |
| 3218585 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Eastern Europe\Lithuania | Lithuania new i.SAF file 1.2 version |
| 3217778 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Eastern Europe\Poland | [Follow-up from DAXSE, 3792286] Polish SAF reports are extremely slow – AX 2012 R3 – Now with in-house repro |
| 4010628 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Eastern Europe\Poland | [POL] – Poland – Incorrect sales tax in Free text invoices in case of marking prices include sales tax |
| 4011520 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Eastern Europe\Poland | Wrong vendor address and tax exempt number is in vat transaction if user change the code after journal validation but before posting |
| 4012049 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Eastern Europe\Poland | Document date is missing after posting purchase order invoice |
| 3212402 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Italy | SEPA CT: On-account payment should inherit the payment journal line payment note to the RmtInf element |
| 3215639 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Italy | [Italy] AX2012 R2 Italian sales tax payment report returns wrong rounded value in Sales tax base and Sales tax charge base columns for transactions with exempt VAT codes |
| 3218271 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Italy | [Italy] AX2012 R3 Error when printing the Italian fiscal journal in batch mode |
| 3218285 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Norway | Norway: Payment id should be printed only once on collection letter |
| 4012453 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Norway | Norway: Norwegian sales tax payment report 2017 – user must be able to send the XML file without adding CID |
| 3218593 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Russian Federation\Profit tax | VehicleModelTable.VehicleModel is too short |
| 4012328 | DAXSE\AXL\Europe Localizations\Sweden | Sweden: ISO20022 CT Payment purpose code must be transferred for international payments |
| 3212595 | DAXSE\AXL\LATAM Localizations\Brazil | AX is incorrectly still displaying the Interest and Fine amounts for an open invoice, even after the user had deleted it from the payment journal form |
| 3216053 | DAXSE\AXL\LATAM Localizations\Brazil | FB: “Cannot create a record in ICMS and ICMS-ST adjust/benefit/incentive (FBFiscalDocumentAdjustment_BR)” error for tax adjustment (Tax type = ICMS-DIF, Adjustment type = Fiscal document) |
| 3216450 | DAXSE\AXL\LATAM Localizations\Brazil | Direct Import PO (Currency = USD) configured with “ICMS tax is configured with Fiscal value = 2. without credit/debit (exempt or not taxable)” causes “Division by zero” error |
| 3218475 | DAXSE\AXL\LATAM Localizations\Brazil | When the ‘Cost absorption journal’ is posted via a batch job (Batch processing = yes) it generates transactions with Voucher # = blank |
| 4010625 | DAXSE\AXL\LATAM Localizations\Brazil | FB: ‘IPI tax assessment book’ report and ‘SPED Fiscal’ file with missing information for IPI tax configured with Fiscal value = 3. without credit/debit (other) |
| 4011776 | DAXSE\AXL\LATAM Localizations\Brazil | AX incorrectly erases the ‘Delivery terms’ and ‘Terms of payment’ fields for a confirmed PO |
| 3213839 | DAXSE\BI and Reporting | Batch Group specified is ignored when running Customer Account Statement Report |
| 3218631 | DAXSE\BI and Reporting | Purchase order report blank in approval by email – after applying DAXSE#3774309 |
| 4010822 | DAXSE\Client\Doc Handling | Images stored in an Archive folder for document management fail to display thumbnails when viewed in EP |
| 3216243 | DAXSE\Developer and Partner Tools\DIXF | Failover support for DIXF service |
| 3217986 | DAXSE\Developer and Partner Tools\DIXF | [AX2012R3] [DIXF] Opening balance data that needs to be imported into AX 2012 R3 using DIXF and EXCEL files results in journal validation errors (unit outside the current penny rounding threshold) |
| 3218169 | DAXSE\Developer and Partner Tools\DIXF | DIXF Product Variant import does not honor order of variant dimensions provided in source file, leading to incorrect order of variants in AX |
| 3218176 | DAXSE\Developer and Partner Tools\DIXF | [AX2012R3] [DIXF] KB 3147499 \Classes\DMFHierarchyValidation\checkComponents method does not check type -> “Connection string must have ‘Database’ specified” even for EXCEL type (which is incorrect) |
| 3216647 | DAXSE\GFM\Accounts Payable\Invoicing | Back dating of Vendor Invoice in multi currency scenario causes matching validation issue |
| 3216877 | DAXSE\GFM\Accounts Payable\Invoicing | Exchange rate field is disabled in vendor invoice register for foreign currency until the record is saved/refreshed |
| 3217424 | DAXSE\GFM\Accounts Payable\Invoicing | A currency to convert from is required to retrieve exchange rate information creating a Vendor Invoice |
| 4010423 | DAXSE\GFM\Accounts Payable\Invoicing | When try to post an invoice for an intercompany sales order on which one one of the sales line has the status ‘Canceled’ AX gives the error message: ‘Error executing code: Division by zero’ |
| 4010849 | DAXSE\GFM\Accounts Payable\Invoicing | Vendor balance posting type repeated on COD invoice |
| 4012357 | DAXSE\GFM\Accounts Payable\Invoicing | Work items assigned to me page will not display Vendor name in ID Field if you use ‘Vendor invoice line’ workflow configuration |
| 3216260 | DAXSE\GFM\Accounts Receivable\Reports | Reprinting an Invoice Journal yields an Cannot create a record in FreeTextInvoviceTmp (FreeTextInvoiceTmp) error when using intercompany |
| 3216950 | DAXSE\GFM\Accounts Receivable\Reports | Junk characters imported in invoice specification report when saved as csv format. |
| 4010400 | DAXSE\GFM\Budget | Unable to select currency when create condition with amount field in workflow editor |
| 3207259 | DAXSE\GFM\Budget\Budget Planning | Generate budget plan from budget register entries backport issues: The selection criteria that were used did not include any records to generate. Update the selection criteria, and then try again. |
| 3191524 | DAXSE\GFM\Cash Management\Currency Revaluation | Financial dimension not updated after currency revaluation while posting purchase invoice using invoice register |
| 4011443 | DAXSE\GFM\Cash Management\Currency Revaluation | Foreign currency revaluation issue when selecting different Posting profile to use in the revaluations |
| 3200966 | DAXSE\GFM\Cash Management\Vendor\Payments and Settlement | AP payment journal throw generic message indicate vendor bank account is inactive and it is specify which vendor ID has this inactive bank |
| 4010952 | DAXSE\GFM\Cash Management\Vendor\Payments and Settlement | When you have a ‘Cash’ Terms of payment defaulting from Customer accounts and you settle invoices for which used a different Terms of Payment, duplicate Settlement records are created during AR Payment journal posting |
| 3218703 | DAXSE\GFM\Expense Management | Expense policy violation justification records are prematurely deleted in multi-level approval hiearchy (possible regression of 1635609) |
| 4010805 | DAXSE\GFM\Expense Management | The estimated expenses for a travel requisition shows a wrong exchange rate after changing the currency |
| 4012157 | DAXSE\GFM\Expense Management | AX 2012 R3 CU12 perdiem “Meal type per day” Error “RegisterRequiresControlState can only be called before and during PreRender.” |
| 4012158 | DAXSE\GFM\Fixed Assets | Reclassification of fixed asset creates wrong ledger transactions – wrong account and wrong amounts. |
| 4010640 | DAXSE\GFM\Fixed Assets\Reports | Fixed Asset Acquisition report is missing Totals |
| 4010641 | DAXSE\GFM\Fixed Assets\Reports | Fixed Asset disposal report is missing Totals |
| 3216491 | DAXSE\GFM\Fixed Assets\Setup | Used fixed asset number is listed on Status list with status Active (Action undecided) when Fixed asset group is changed |
| 3216640 | DAXSE\GFM\Fixed Assets\Setup | Fixed asset disposal scrap generates error message related to account setup |
| 3217271 | DAXSE\GFM\General Ledger | cannot use drop-down on the ledger calendar – Module access field when using Windows 7 and Windows 10 32-bit clients |
| 4010411 | DAXSE\GFM\General Ledger | The GeneralJournalAccountEntry apply fixed dimensions code needs to rebuild the dimension to avoid validation errors during posting |
| 4010463 | DAXSE\GFM\General Ledger | Reversal of Invoice transaction with accruals is returning an error message “Fiscal period is not open” |
| 4011448 | DAXSE\GFM\General Ledger | AX 2012R3CU12 – When “Intercompany accounting” license key is turned off General ledger journal line Offset account type can only be ledger – other account type create Stack trace message |
| 4011449 | DAXSE\GFM\General Ledger\Chart of Accounts | Closing sheet posts locked manual account |
| 4011348 | DAXSE\GFM\Source Document Framework | Purchase order invoice return an error message “SourceDocumentAmount object not initialized.” |
| 3090975 | DAXSE\GFM\Tax\Tax Calculation | Sales tax transactions are missing |
| 3218519 | DAXSE\Public Sector\AR\Invoicing | Dimension value doesn’t update correctly on changing the billing code value on FTI Lines. |
| 3216132 | DAXSE\Public Sector\Budget | Rounding error when trying to finalize a GBR or run a GBR through year-end |
| 3217253 | DAXSE\Public Sector\Budget | Budget analysis inquiry bug when same main account code is used two legal entities |
| 3218680 | DAXSE\Public Sector\GL\Periodic | The PO and GBR year-end processes should not allow negative balances for documents or lines |
| 4010807 | DAXSE\Public Sector\GL\Periodic | Unable to succesfully run Public Sector Financials year-end closing when using Advanced rules against Main Accounts: “You can’t generate opening and closing transactions for the following ledger accounts. These accounts are no longer valid” |
| 4011808 | DAXSE\Public Sector\GL\Setup | ALL Derived financial hierarchy filters are removed when one node is deleted |
| 3211635 | DAXSE\Public Sector\GL\Transactions | Advanced ledger entries do not create penny difference transactions |
| 4010429 | DAXSE\Public Sector\GL\Transactions | If you have an ALE workflow active in one company but not in others the other companies can’t post an ALE entries unless you disable it in the one company that has it active |
| 3198617 | DAXSE\SCM\CRM | Sales management OLAP reports fail with an error in systems that use date seperator as “Dot” |
| 4011311 | DAXSE\SCM\CRM\Sales Process | Printing from sales unit designer does not work |
| 3210820 | DAXSE\SCM\Inventory Costing\Cost Module\Inventory Closing | Inventory closing/Check cost price report not showing variant details in the headers. It only shows new header when item number is different, and not when variant is different |
| 3141975 | DAXSE\SCM\Inventory Costing\Cost Sheet | Problems with saving Inventory costing sheet changes when creating a new node from an existing Process node: “Calculation factors are not specified” |
| 3217684 | DAXSE\SCM\Inventory\Consumer Goods Distribution\Catch Weight Management | Illegal Split error canceling pick line after CW batch reservation split |
| 3216633 | DAXSE\SCM\Inventory\Inventory Management\Inventory Control | On-hand Report considering WMS Picking Transaction |
| 3217659 | DAXSE\SCM\Inventory\Inventory Management\Shelf Life Management | Sales inventory transactions are inconsistent when reducing sales order quantity due to FEFO reservation strategy |
| 4012229 | DAXSE\SCM\Planning | Wrong quantities in the net requirements form period tab when quality order exists |
| 4010421 | DAXSE\SCM\Planning\Master Planning | MRP – No planned orders if forecast date is prior to the best before date but within the sellable days |
| 4010764 | DAXSE\SCM\Planning\Master Planning | Supply Forecast planned orders are not generated for Formula type items if the master plan forecast reduction principle is set to “Transactions – Dynamic Period” |
| 3217981 | DAXSE\SCM\Planning\Scheduling | Scheduling production order with schedule and synchronise references is not calculating correct delivery dates |
| 3217651 | DAXSE\SCM\Procurement | Cannot edit a record in Purchase Order lines (PurchLine). An update conflict occurred due to another user process deleting the record or changing one or more field in the record |
| 4011426 | DAXSE\SCM\Procurement\Intercompany | Original Purchase Order’s Line in Intercompany Chain can be incorrectly canceled if the Item is ‘Stopped’ in the Selling company leaving you with a Stuck Intercompany Sales Order |
| 3208949 | DAXSE\SCM\Procurement\Purchase Orders | Account distribution is not updated if FA info/dimensions are changed in a PO if this PO was created with parameter “Copy Precisely” |
| 3217212 | DAXSE\SCM\Procurement\Purchase Orders | Correct line discount is not applied when the delivery date is changed on the header. |
| 3218456 | DAXSE\SCM\Product\Product Master Data Management\Product Data Management | Stack trace error message when creating the case |
| 3216135 | DAXSE\SCM\Production and Shop Floor\Batch Orders | Not possible to overproduce co-product with planning formula when open picking list journal exists. |
| 4010791 | DAXSE\SCM\Production and Shop Floor\Production Journals | Changing the operation priority on route card journals does not change Category hours accordingly |
| 3162724 | DAXSE\SCM\Production and Shop Floor\Production Orders | Operation number 20 is changed to 10 when firming planned order if DAXSE 3745362 is installed |
| 3217199 | DAXSE\SCM\Production and Shop Floor\Production Orders | Unable to post to Scrap account when ending a Production order if a Location is not present on the Production Order: “Inventory dimension location must be specified” |
| 3218460 | DAXSE\SCM\Production and Shop Floor\Production Orders | The Production user roles do not provide the ability to delete product orders from the “All production orders” list page |
| 3210812 | DAXSE\SCM\Production and Shop Floor\Shop Floor Control\Time and Attendance | Transfer to Pay – Cannot create flex adjustment. Registrations for employee 000520 has not been transferred on the 12/20/2015 |
| 3217766 | DAXSE\SCM\Production and Shop Floor\WMS Integration | Can’t create work for a Production order that has had work canceled and then been reset |
| 3218232 | DAXSE\SCM\Production and Shop Floor\WMS Integration | Need to port 3759116 back to AX 2012 R3-Staging issue raw material picking |
| 3218598 | DAXSE\SCM\Production and Shop Floor\WMS Integration | ‘Reset status’ feature for ‘received’ inventory transactions (‘Catch Weight’ enabled item), is not returning the total CW qty |
| 3052692 | DAXSE\SCM\Sales\Sales Orders | Positive Sales Invoice printed as Credit Note |
| 3214792 | DAXSE\SCM\Sales\Sales Orders | Report “Customer/Item statistics” shows incorrect figures when the sales lines are deleted |
| 3215310 | DAXSE\SCM\Sales\Sales Orders | Changing Terms of Delivery on a Sales Order does not work with third party |
| 4010401 | DAXSE\SCM\Sales\Sales Orders | Item registration and re-registration process on RMA order is creating wrong extra lines in SalesLine Table |
| 4011947 | DAXSE\SCM\Sales\Sales Orders | Alternative sales item cannot be saved when storage dimension is different |
| 4010602 | DAXSE\SCM\Sales\Sales Pricing | Incorrect amount used for sales credit note when zero price but amount is not in order lines |
| 3217692 | DAXSE\SCM\Service Management | Show Details doesn’t work in Activities form for Associations of type Service order and Service order line |
| 3217156 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation | Sales order with a release status of “Released” but still have unreleased lines |
| 3216009 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation\Transportation Management | Transportation management miscellaneous charges assigned to sales orders use the most recent charges record created. |
| 3215972 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation\Transportation Management\Freight Reconciliation | Wrong payment specification defaulting on payment journal from Transportation Management |
| 3182401 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation\Warehouse Management | Verification Shows Previous Item after Short Pick |
| 3209909 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation\Warehouse Management | Clicking full when executing a replenishment work does not update the replenishment – demand work links |
| 3216396 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation\Warehouse Management | Work Audit Template does not set shipment to “Shipped” if picking work uses Group Put Away to put multiple loads/shipments |
| 4012149 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation\Warehouse Management | KB 3176176 causes regression that allows backflush batch consumption from locations other than the input location |
| 3216215 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation\Warehouse Management\Picking and Putaway | Unable to report as finished production orders in steps from mobile device when automatic batch allocation is used. |
| 3216598 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation\Warehouse Management\Picking and Putaway | Mobile device pick and pack issue- Line gets duplicated on pack form |
| 4011433 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation\Warehouse Management\Shipment Management | Physical dimensions information missing in packing slip when posting from a Load |
| 3215273 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation\Warehouse Management\Work and Worker Management | Consistency check addition fix the data issue resulting from issue “Ability to round up work for raw material picking in the unit the material is picked – Work stuck on user location” |
| 4011338 | DAXSE\SCM\Warehouse and Transportation\Warehouse Management\Work and Worker Management | When allowing splitting of work on Mobile Device Menu Item configuration and Skipping the first line in Sales Picking work, you are unable to use the Full option |
| 4010494 | DAXSE\Server | User ID and User Name of AX user imported using New-AXUser command is not the same as AX user imported from Users form. |
| 4010499 | DAXSE\Setup\Installation\Server setup | Hotfix installer doesn’t update the models when the environment has multiple AOS instance having separate Model database for each instance. |
| 3216381 | DAXSE\SI | Retention and sales tax cause an invalid match variance on an invoice |
| 3206182 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting | Wrong reference for item requirements in Projects when Update marking = Standard |
| 3216496 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting\Budget and Forecast | Project item journal validating incorrectly against inventory on hand cost |
| 4010439 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting\Budget and Forecast | project budget control does not validate when Create item requirement and Check budget on document line save= yes |
| 4010441 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting\Budget and Forecast | Negative expenses or credit notes do not affect the budget project funds |
| 3213510 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting\Commited Costs | Committed cost are re-opened after changing SO |
| 3216671 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting\Commited Costs | Incorrect committed costs when you partially invoice a project purchase order |
| 3216495 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting\Estimates | Advance payments on fixed price projects disappear after posting estimates |
| 4010425 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting\Estimates | Completion percentage displayed is wrong for running the estimate for multiple projects |
| 4010428 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting\Estimates | No voucher is generated if reversing an estimate when there is a reversed elimination |
| 3195703 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting\FIM Integration | Project PO is partially posted with no posted cost whenever copy from all feature is used |
| 3218430 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting\FIM Integration | Calendar is missing if project quotation is created from Customers form |
| 4011468 | DAXSE\SI\Project Accounting\FIM Integration | Division by zero error with project posted transactions list page |
| 3211280 | DAXSE\SI\Project Contracts and Billing\Billing Rules | Fee transacions can be posted over funding limit after installing KB 3193987 |
| 3212918 | DAXSE\SI\Project Contracts and Billing\Customer Retention | Only retained amount of Credit note remains after credit note for project invoice proposal is posted. |
| 3205000 | DAXSE\SI\Project Contracts and Billing\Invoicing | Missing transactions on forms and invoice propposal with zero amount in project control after posting hours for some subprojects Id’s |
| 3217698 | DAXSE\SI\Project Contracts and Billing\Invoicing | Incorrect project invoice proposal when submitting to workflow |
| 4010430 | DAXSE\SI\Project Contracts and Billing\Invoicing | Missing invoice line amount update on invoice proposal after adding new fees |
| 4010831 | DAXSE\SI\Project Contracts and Billing\Invoicing | On account transaction milestone status remain chargeable after posting invoice |
| 3216112 | DAXSE\SI\Project Timesheet | Issue with Internal and external comments in intercompany timesheets (same issue for processing timesheets from a single company) |
| 4012177 | DAXSE\SI\Project Timesheet | External comments from timesheets gets truncated in Adjust transactions |
↧
ePOS | Retail Implementation using SQL Express
Hi Guys, in this blog I want to share my experience regarding use of SQL express for ePOS (Enterprise POS) – Online Database and Offline Database. The experience is from my recent Dynamics AX Retail...(read more)![]()
↧
Awareness | Worldwide | Payments | Planned Maintenance for Dynamics Online Payments | March 8th-March 10th, 2017
The Service Engineering team will be doing planned maintenance on the Payments Service. The maintenance will start at 10:00 PM PST on March 8th through 8:00 AM PST on March 9th and 10:00 PM PST on March...(read more)![]()
↧
↧
Using hardware station from Windows Phone MPOS
Microsoft released the MPOS for Windows Phone a while ago and although a bit rough to install it works very well.
Next step was to get it to work with my wireless receipt printer through a hardware station...(read more)![]()
↧
Common navigation in Update 4
I noticed that the global navigation features are implemented WAY better in Update 4 then earlier versions.
If you click the “waffle” (3×3 dot grid) in the top left corner in Update...(read more)![]()
↧
D365FO – Test & Feedback
Visual Studio Team Services Marketplace contains a ton of jewels, and one add-in I like a lot is the Test & Feedback extension to VSTS:
When installing it, you get a small icon in Chrome, where test and feedback can be given.
When setting it up, you just point to the VSTS site :
And then you are ready to start giving feedback, and to collect backorders, bugs or tests.
Let’s say I wanted the implementation team to know that some changes are necessary on the “All Customers” form. I then click on the feedback button, and click on “start recording”
While navigating and taking screenshots, notes and video, it all gets recorded, with URL, time etc.
When done with my recording I want to create a bug, test or create a test case:
In this case, create a bug, and while I’m typing I can even see that there are one similar bug already reported.
After saving the bug. I see that a bug have been created in VSTS:
I now have a complete bug report in VSTS, that the consultants can start to process and to identify if this is a bug or an “as designed” feature
This means that in a Dynamics 365 project where VSTS is the central element, the feedback and testing just got simpler.
The feedback and Test extension do contain a lot more, but the rest you have to explore for yourself. Try out video recording . That is really cool.
↧
Extensible enums: Breaking change for .NET libraries that you need to be aware of
A while back I wrote a blog post describing the Extensible Enums - a new feature that is part of Dynamics 365 for Operations:
http://kashperuk.blogspot.com/2016/09/development-tutorial-extensible-base.html
I explained that when marking an enumeration as extensible, the representation of this enum under the hood (in CLR) changes. Here's the specific quote:
The extensible enums are represented in![]()
![]()
↧
↧
Microsoft partner Arbela completes acquisition of Integral USA, bolstering Dynamics 365 & AX service, support
Arbela Technologies
Corp. , a Microsoft Dynamics 365 Gold Partner, has announced that it has completed
the integration of Integral USA LLC.
Arbela has acquired substantially all the assets of
Integral, including its customers, employees and ...read more![]()
↧
The Truth About Digital Transformation
Sometimes it feels like software and IT have a more powerful hype generator than most other industries. Often, it’s a short distance from today inspired catchphrase to tomorrow’s tired cliché. It becomes easy to forget what got us excited and enthusiastic about certain ideas when nothing really changes in the way you run your business.
Digital transformation is one of those concepts that could easily result in hype and disappointment. There’ve been too many IT initiatives described as transformative when all they did is provide people with tools to be more productive or make certain processes more efficient.
It’s for you
However, digital transformation is real. The visionaries and innovation leaders in many industries are using digital technologies to anticipate and respond to customer demand, collaboratively develop new products, connect operations around the globe in a seamless flow, and enable their people to achieve their ambitions.
Even better, digital transformation is not confined to the large enterprises that can commandeer a wealth of resources and whose budgets are unlimited compared to yours.
With modern cloud technologies, you can now benefit from the most advanced computing resources available today, but you don’t need to own them. You subscribe to them as a service, using exactly the functionality you want. Unlike can often be the case with on-premise software products, you don’t pay for capabilities that would never make a difference for your business.
You can get going today
In the cloud, you find the data storage, networking, information protection, and software applications that can help you run and grow your business and transform it for a digital future. The leading cloud providers also have created powerful arsenals of business intelligence tools to help you make sound decisions and perform reliable planning based on evidence. And, if you need to make sense of masses of information such as data streams from the internet of things (IoT), in the cloud it’s much easier to store, safeguard, process, and analyze them.
With Microsoft Dynamics 365 on the Azure cloud platform, modern ERP and CRM capabilities have come to the cloud. You can make use of them in a modular manner, starting with the functionality that’s most valuable, and add others as you move forward. Dynamics 365 integrates easily with your on-premise applications, Office 365, and a wealth of business intelligence resources such as Power BI and the Cortana Intelligence Suite.
Digital business transformation is no longer the exclusive domain of the industry leaders. You can embark on your own transformation initiative in the cloud while keeping it real – close to your goals, predictable, and low-risk. Columbus offers the expertise and complementary business solutions to make cloud-based transformation pay off for you. To find out more about how to get started, navigate to our website to read our e-book, “How to Start Your Cloud Transformation Journey”.
↧
AX reporting issues causing downtime?
You’ve told us one of your biggest challenges in AX is Reporting. Whether you’re printing reports or determining an entire Business Intelligence strategy, the options are huge. And no one company’s needs are exactly the same as the next. Hence the need for a tailored solution that meets your needs, but doesn’t break your development budget - which means we need to get as much out of the core AX product as we can. No small feat, right?
But learning all this comes with plenty of challenges that can slow your momentum and cause down time. As one AXUG member put it, "Reporting is the bane of every IT manager's existence."
While we can't make you a reporting expert in a day, AXUG can offer you a wealth of resources provided by your peers - real Dynamics users and select partners who have 'been there, solved that.'
Exclusive training opportunities - upcoming live webinars on reporting:
| Wed., March 29 | 11 AM ET | AX 2009: A Start to Developing User-Tailored Reporting. What Comes Out-of-the-Box? |
| Tues., April 4 | 11 AM ET | Public Sector Reporting: A Horse of a Different Color |
| Tues., April 11 | 2 PM ET | How to Time and Plan Reporting & BI for Your Implementation or Upgrade to 2012 or D365 |
| Thur., April 27 | 11 AM ET | AX 2012: A Start to Developing User-tailored Reporting --Cubes and Role Centers |
| Wed., May 3 | 11 AM ET | AX 2012: A Start to Developing User-tailored Reporting --SSRS |
| Wed., May 23 | 11 AM ET | Knowing When AX OOB Reporting and BI is Not Enough |
Blogs - members who have written about reporting:
How to see an item's purchase history by Kelly Kane, Microsoft MVP
Information access - Reporting in AX by TJ Vassar, Microsoft
Modern Reporting Strategies for Dynamics AX by Don Riggs, ICN
Special Interest Group - focused discussions and learning around a specific topic:
Business Intelligence (BI) & Reporting for AX 2012
AX 2009 Operations and Maintenance
D365 for Operations
Tip Sheet - a quick overview of Power BI:
Introduction to the Power BI Platform
In-person training with learning tracks for the IT Professional:
Dynamics 365 Tech Conference | March 12-15, 2017 | Tracks: System admin, Reporting & Analytics | www.d365tech.com/home
Summit EMEA |4-6 April, 2017| Tracks: BI & Reporting, Functional, Retail, Security, Technical | www.summitemea.com/home
AXUG Focus | May 8 & 9, 2017 | Tracks: Power BI, Retail, Technical | www.ugfocus.com/home
AXUG Summit | October 10-13, 2017 | www.axugsummit.com
Distance Learning topics offered through AXUG Academy:
Intro to Management Reporter
Advanced Management Reporter
Deep Dive into Power BI 2 Day Workshop
KPIs, SSAS & Cubes in Dynamics AX
To register for a deep-dive training, visit: www.axug.com/engage/academy
Perhaps we can think about reporting in another light, which could make it appear less daunting. Here's how one well-respected IT Manager within the AX community puts it:
"The biggest hurdle for people to overcome is that AX provides information, they just need to change their way of thinking around reports. Everyone expects these great reports out of AX, and it’s just not designed for that. Once people can get past the unnecessary NEED to have a piece of paper with information in front of them, they can really start using the system as intended – a live view into your company’s operations and financial status."
Let us know other reporting resources you've found helpful by posting a comment on this post.
↧
Announcement: Warehouse Mobile Devices Portal improvements with February update of AX 2012 R3
A monthly cadence AX 2012 R3 update for February has just come out on LCS, and with it a few changes our team has done that deal with overall behavior and performance of WMDP - the Warehouse Mobile Devices Portal used in the Advanced warehousing module.
I want to call them out here, and if you are reading my blog to keep up to date with the Warehousing changes, I strongly encourage you to![]()
![]()
↧
↧
AX Word of the Week: X++
In my AX Word of the Week post last week on the AOT, I briefly mentioned the code in AX that developers work with to make the system work as intended. Well, that programming language, X++, is the AX Soup Word of the Week!
X++ is the AX programming language, and is most similar to the programming language C#.
Here is an interesting MSDN article that compares the two: X++, C# Comparison: Hello World [AX 2012]
There are several other comparison articles just like this that compare loops, string case and delimiters, array syntax, operators, and several other programming language fundamentals. You can navigate to those through the link above.
X++ is only used in Microsoft Dynamics AX. It is a class-based, object-oriented programming language. It also allows for the use of SQL queries within the language.
Also, if you are so inclined, please check out this wiki on X++ syntax: https://ax.help.dynamics.com/en/wiki/x-syntax/.
The wiki is actually very helpful and should you opt to learn the programming language in AX and become an AX developer, it will provide you with the basic knowledge that you need to proceed in working with X++.
![]()
X++
X++ is the AX programming language, and is most similar to the programming language C#.
Here is an interesting MSDN article that compares the two: X++, C# Comparison: Hello World [AX 2012]
There are several other comparison articles just like this that compare loops, string case and delimiters, array syntax, operators, and several other programming language fundamentals. You can navigate to those through the link above.
X++ is only used in Microsoft Dynamics AX. It is a class-based, object-oriented programming language. It also allows for the use of SQL queries within the language.
Also, if you are so inclined, please check out this wiki on X++ syntax: https://ax.help.dynamics.com/en/wiki/x-syntax/.
The wiki is actually very helpful and should you opt to learn the programming language in AX and become an AX developer, it will provide you with the basic knowledge that you need to proceed in working with X++.
↧
D365FO Channels, Insiders Preview and Update Policy
As announced with the update 4, Microsoft will release monthly updates so that new and existing environments can stay up-to-date with the latest innovations with a click of a button. Hopefully this make it easier to stay on the newest platform. We are also assuming and hoping that this approach in the future will extend to also cover business functionality (eg ApplicationSuite). A faster update cycle also results that there are more versions currently used in at customers. As seen here are all the official releases that Microsoft have made available for Dynamics 365 for operations. With a monthly update cycle the list will be extended quickly. Keeping track on versions does not give any actual customers value. But in a SaaS approach, creating faster and simplified updated on business functionality will require a better and more visible release policy, not based on build numbers.
We need to make this upgrade and update experience easier to understand and easier to follow. The work that the Microsoft Office and Windows team have done is a great example that I think is something we also should have for Dynamics 365: The introduction of release channels.
Update channel | Primary purpose | Feature updates | Platform updates | Security Updates |
Preview Channel | Provide users to evaluate the newest features of Dynamics 365 as soon as possible. The channel is only available through an insider program, and is not deployable into a production environment. | Weekly | Weekly | Weekly |
First Channel | Provide users with the newest features of Dynamics 365. | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
Current Channel | Provide users with the released and stable features of Dynamics 365. | Every 3 months | Monthly | Monthly |
Deferred Channel | Provide users with new features of Dynamics 365 only a few times a year. | Every 6 months | Monthly | Monthly |
What channel you would like to have should be a setting in LCS, and the customers can switch between the channels as wanted. Visually the release and update schedule could then look something like this.
With the introduction of Microsoft AppSource and for ISV’s this would mean that they could commit to a specific channel, and “front-runners” like myself would have early access to the newest and hottest. Some customers are deadly serious about stability, and new features could potentially cripple business processes. In this way customers can for them self’s decide their speed for adding new functionality.
Dear Microsoft; Can we have something like this also for Dynamics 365?
↧
Hyper link for the fields(AX Form ) - Dynamics 365 operation/AX7
Hi All,
Just to share how to add the Hype link for the the fields in the form(which takes to the master form - related record when click on the field).
Normally it can be done be the following ways...(read more)![]()
↧
Observations regarding the Amazon S3 Outage
Downtime is a mystery until you are back up.
While we don’t anticipate many Microsoft Dynamics ERP users were running on the Amazon S3 (which stands for Simple Storage Service – a part of Amazon Web Services) a huge number of websites store content and run services on S3. Among the sites and services that appeared to be affected were Slack, Quora, Lonely Planet, Snapchat's Bitmoji, Hulu, Hubspot and even the US Securities and Exchange Commission website. The outage lasted 4 hours February 28th and is apt to give pause to companies who are considering running their ERP solutions in a public cloud. Learn about Microsoft Dynamics ERP hosting services.
If you are in the process of deciding between public vs private cloud, remember the following if you are concerned about the AWS outage:
Limited information–All you get is a dashboard with a red light, and in this particular case Amazon Web Services tweeted at one point that the "dashboard" that allows users to see the status of its own services was not able to update itself because of the S3 technical problem.
Limited communication–We view this differently than information on a dashboard. Communication is typically when you are able to let your customer base know what the problem is, time to resolve and any issues they will encounter post resolution and who to contact. Information like this is usually never readily available in a public cloud – hence downtime is always a mystery until you are back up.
Longer downtime—Massive reboot effort takes longer than more agile, boutique cloud services: According to news reports a full restart was required which took longer than expected due to the number of servers involved. This is where we believe bigger is NOT always better.
Observations regarding the Amazon S3 Outage https://www.amazonaws.cn/en/s3/sla/ - We had a hard time getting this site to load , due – we expect - to the volume of people requesting data. Amazon does offer an SLA for the S3 service, guaranteeing 99.9% uptime or part of your money back. With .1% of a month being around 45 minutes, that means they owe people money. What's an SLA for Cloud and what should it include?
However, Amazon's requirements for claiming a refund are onerous. With requirements to submit request logs documenting errors and corroborating your claimed outage, don’t expect anyone except large users to bother. We suspect Amazon will indicated that this wasn't technically an "outage," since Amazon's S3 was not entirely out of commission and some services were only partially affected. Not much help if you are down.
Of course, when an event like this happens, everyone starts rethinking their cloud strategy including considerations such as:
- Public vs. private
- Mission critical applications vs. file storage
- Acceptable downtime vs. redundancy
If you are in the process of choosing a cloud solution for your Dynamic ERP application let’s begin a discussion on how RoseASP’s private cloud overcomes the public cloud mystery.
At Rose ASP we:
- Inform
- Communicate
- Refund when it’s our fault – no paperwork required.
↧
↧
New Microsoft Dynamics AX MVP says learning AX comes with work, long hours
For Sohaib Cheema, being named a Microsoft MVP in July 2016 was more than a thrill - it affirmed his passion for helping the
greater community.
"It is a great thing because you are not doing it for the
money," he says. "You are ...read more![]()
↧
While Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Operations remains cloud-centric, local model broadens reach
Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Operations is reaching its official
one year anniversary this month, having formally
launched in 137 markets in March 2016.
In that year of Azure-only deployments, Microsoft
representatives say they have evolved and ...read more![]()
↧
Delete Not Yet Acquired Fixed Asset.
while user from Fixed Asset department wanted to delete not yet acquired fixed asset he was receiving below error in Dynamics AX 2012 R2 CU7.
A financial dimension value is based on the AID067285 record...(read more)![]()
↧